On Mon, 14 May 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Salut Thomas, > > Sorry for the delay. > > On 5/4/2012 5:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Hello Benoit, > > > > Le Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0200, > > Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > Add SoC specific map_io function to be used by the generic DT > > > board file. This is an intermediate step before having some > > > generic DT aware map_io function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx> > > > Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Do you know if some progress has been made on having a generic DT aware > > map_io function, or is the per-SoC ->map_io() function still the > > recommended way of handling SoC having different requirements of static > > mappings at boot time? > > Mmm, Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure people are really pushing to store that > inside DT. But to be honest, I don't really know :-) In general, static vs dynamic IO mappings are just some Linux implementation details. This distinction does not belong in DT. Nicolas
