On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also, were you intending pinctrl-simple to actually be the GPIO > controller itself? That'd be another case that one might consider fairly > simple, but then extends to being gpio-simple as well as pinctrl-simple... We have some pinctrl drivers implementing gpiolib too already, and it's unavoidable I think, as some recent discussion about matcing struct gpio_chip and pinctrl GPIO ranges shows. Maybe "-simple" isn't such a good name for this thing. Noone thinks any kind of pin control is simple in any sense of the word anyway :-D Tony, would pinctrl-dt-only.c be a better name perhaps? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
