Hi Jon, On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:38:24, Hunter, Jon wrote: > > Different ways of doing things, this looks cleaner to me as already it is > > checked, and time of execution in both cases would not differ much. > > Sure. However, I think that this could be simplified so that it is > easier to read. At a minimum you may wish to add some comments to > explain the purposes of the multi-level if-statements as it is not > intuitive for the reader. Ok > >> What happens if a device uses more than one wait-pin? In other words a > >> device with two chip-selects that uses two wait-pins? > > > > Please re-read http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg67702.html > > and your reply > > Ok thats fine. Sorry for my repeated questions, but I think that this > just highlights that this code is not clear in it purpose. So again may > be some comments would make this all clearer. Ok Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html