* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> [120508 01:48]: > On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:46 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> [120503 07:01]: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I started cleaning up and restructuring omapdss for device tree, and here's the > > > first set of patches from that ordeal. There's nothing DT specific in these > > > patches, but they are mostly generic cleanups that make sense even without DT. > > > > > > This is the second version of these patches, the previous version can be found > > > from: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg05667.html > > > > > > The first 21 patches, which were in the previous version, have only gotten > > > minor cleanups (and, of course, more testing). The last 4 patches are new. The > > > most important of those patches is the DSI pin config patch, which makes it > > > possible for the panel driver to configure the DSI pins it needs. > > > > > > This series can also be found from: > > > git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git work/devtree-base > > > > Nice clean up. Can you please put the first 12 arch/arm/*omap*/* touching > > patches (and the drivers/video dependencies needed) into a separate branch > > and send me a pull request. That is assuming those patches are now immutable. > > > > Then I can pull it into cleanup-dss branch that we both can merge as > > needed. > > Ok, I'll see how it goes. Do I have your ack for the board file changes? Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Do you want to have patches that touch only > arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c, but not the board files? That's a dss > specific file, and I don't expect anyone else to make changes to it, so > chances for conflicts should be quite minimal. Yes probably board-*.c files are enough to avoid annoying merge conflicts. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
