* R, Sricharan <r.sricharan@xxxxxx> [120506 00:40]:
>
> > Also, please change the whole series to use CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5 instead
> > of CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP5. CONFIG_ARCH_OMAPXXXX stuff will go away except
> > for CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS. Sorry forgot to mention that earlier.
> >
> ok. sure. will change this.
Thanks.
> >> -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) && !(defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || \
> >> - defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3))
> >> +#if (defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP5) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)) && \
> >> + !(defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3))
> >> +
> >> static inline u32 omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(s16 module, u16 idx)
> >> {
> >> WARN(1, "prm: omap2xxx/omap3xxx specific function and "
> >
> > Maybe these functions could be just set up as __weak to avoid the
> > ifdeffery?
> >
> sorry to understand,
> you mean make this weak and have a strong override for OMAP2 ?
Yeah that should do the trick, right?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
