On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Tarun,
>
> by the way,
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
>
>> We do not use iclk anywhere in the dmtimer driver and so removing it.
>> Hence removing the timer iclk entries from OMAP4 clkdev table as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c | 11 -----------
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 7 -------
>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/dmtimer.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/dmtimer.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/dmtimer.h
>> index 9418f00..be2b8c4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/dmtimer.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/dmtimer.h
>> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ struct omap_dm_timer {
>> unsigned long phys_base;
>> int id;
>> int irq;
>> - struct clk *iclk, *fclk;
>> + struct clk *fclk;
>>
>> void __iomem *io_base;
>> void __iomem *sys_stat; /* TISTAT timer status */
>
> Am dropping this stray change, it seems unrelated to the rest of the
> patch.
Since the only usage of timer->iclk is removed from mach-omap2/timer.c
there is no
point in keeping this field in struct omap_dm_timer {}.
Unless you are suggesting that both the above should be separated into
a separate patch?
--
Tarun
>
>
> - Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
