On 04/02/2012 10:38 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Santosh, >> >> I came across the attached patch from you. I also came across this post >> stating that it was decided not to send this patch upstream. >> >> http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/18885/8437/#post8496 >> >> The problem is that we have to keep porting this patch each time we >> update the kernel. >> >> Do you know if the root cause has been found? If not can we have this >> patch upstream till the root cause is found? >> > Yes and fixed in OMAP4460 ES1.2. Did you mean ES1.1? Could you please point me to the errata ID? The only cache related errata I can see is Errata ID: i690 > >> It seems the patch at least makes the kernel usable on ES1.0. >> > I know but that still is not enough. It's like 80 % WA of the issue > seen on ES1.0. We are not suppose to have many boards with > ES1.0 > Even better if there are not many boards. It seems most of the boards will be with TI. I think we should have the fix in even if it is not 100% fix. What do you say? regards, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
