"DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:10 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti > <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> In _enable_gpio_irqbank() when bank->regs->set_irqenable is valid, >>>> gpio_mask can be directly set by writing to set_irqenable register >>>> without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is >>>> stored in context.irqenable1, we must read from regs->irqenable >>>> instead of overwriting it with gpio_mask. >>> >>>> The overwriting makes sense only in the second case where irqenable >>>> is explicitly read and updated with new gpio_mask before writing it >>>> back. However, for consistency reading regs->irqenable into the >>>> bank->context.irqenable1 takes care of both the scenarios. >>> >>> ...except that the code doesn't do this anymore. >> Yes. >>> >>> I like the newer version (I hope so, since I suggested it :), but please >>> update the changlog to describe what the code is actually doing. >> Sure. > I have updated the change log here: > git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev > for_3.4/gpio_more_fixes Please also post and updated version of the patch for review. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
