On 03/21/2012 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Daniel, On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code. The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the driver itself. A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only and why the WFI is not used ? Daniel Lezcano (7): ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot timeThe series looks fine to me in general. This clean-up is applicable for OMAP3 cpuidle code as well.
Yes, I am planning to do the same for omap3. Thanks for reviewing. -- Daniel
I want Jean to look at this series because some of his earlier clean up has introduced those custom functions which are getting removed in this series. Regards santosh
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
