Daniel, On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code. > The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the > driver itself. > > A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only > and why the WFI is not used ? > > Daniel Lezcano (7): > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly > ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot > time > The series looks fine to me in general. This clean-up is applicable for OMAP3 cpuidle code as well. I want Jean to look at this series because some of his earlier clean up has introduced those custom functions which are getting removed in this series. Regards santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
