On Tuesday 06 March 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:11:37PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think 'depends' would be better here, because selecting IOMMU_SUPPORT > > > has other side-effects that a user might not want. It's just as likely > > > that someone wants to disable IOMMU_SUPPORT and needs to find OMAP_REMOTEPROC > > > as wanting to enable OMAP_REMOTEPROC and having to find IOMMU_SUPPORT. > > > > > > In most cases, the defconfig should just set both. > > > > Ok, 'depends on' it is. > > We're a week on, which means I now have a full set of 7 builds on the > website for OMAP4430 all of which have failed in part due to this > as yet unresolved problem. > > What's happening to get it fixed and those fixes into whatever tree is > necessary for them (presumably arm-soc)? Ohad has sent a series of patches for review and there were no comments on those. The fix was part of it as far as I remember. I'm still waiting for a pull request from Ohad. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
