On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:11:37PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think 'depends' would be better here, because selecting IOMMU_SUPPORT > > has other side-effects that a user might not want. It's just as likely > > that someone wants to disable IOMMU_SUPPORT and needs to find OMAP_REMOTEPROC > > as wanting to enable OMAP_REMOTEPROC and having to find IOMMU_SUPPORT. > > > > In most cases, the defconfig should just set both. > > Ok, 'depends on' it is. We're a week on, which means I now have a full set of 7 builds on the website for OMAP4430 all of which have failed in part due to this as yet unresolved problem. What's happening to get it fixed and those fixes into whatever tree is necessary for them (presumably arm-soc)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
