Hi, On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 13:44 +0530, mythripk@xxxxxx wrote: > From: Mythri P K <mythripk@xxxxxx> > > Currently TX_PHY is put to TX_ON(transmission state) on receiving HPD. > It just ensures that the TV is connected but does not guarantee > that TMDS data lines and clock lines are up and ready for transmission. > Which although is very rare scenario has a potential to damage the HDMI > port.(A use case where TV is connected to board but it is in different > channel would still trigger a HPD but TMDS lines will be down). When/how does the damaging happen? When the HDMI cable is disconnected in the case above? Or does the damage just happen by having the cable connected, but the TV on different channel? > Thus this patch adds a rxdet check on getting a HPD which ensures that > TMDS lines are UP before changing the PHY state from LDO_ON to TX_ON. > > Signed-off-by: Mythri P K <mythripk@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/ti_hdmi_4xxx_ip.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/ti_hdmi_4xxx_ip.h | 2 + > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/ti_hdmi_4xxx_ip.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/ti_hdmi_4xxx_ip.c > index bb784d2..bc55528 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/ti_hdmi_4xxx_ip.c > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/ti_hdmi_4xxx_ip.c > @@ -224,6 +224,30 @@ void ti_hdmi_4xxx_pll_disable(struct hdmi_ip_data *ip_data) > hdmi_set_pll_pwr(ip_data, HDMI_PLLPWRCMD_ALLOFF); > } > > +int hdmi_ti_4xxx_rxdet(struct hdmi_ip_data *ip_data) > +{ > + int loop = 0, tmds_data0, tmds_data1, tmds_data2, tmds_clk; > + > + hdmi_write_reg(hdmi_wp_base(ip_data), HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_CFG, 4); > + > + do { > + tmds_data0 = hdmi_read_reg(hdmi_wp_base(ip_data), > + HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_DATA); > + tmds_data1 = hdmi_read_reg(hdmi_wp_base(ip_data), > + HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_DATA); > + tmds_data2 = hdmi_read_reg(hdmi_wp_base(ip_data), > + HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_DATA); > + tmds_clk = hdmi_read_reg(hdmi_wp_base(ip_data), > + HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_DATA); > + udelay(15); This code doesn't make any sense, or the HDMI TRM is wrong. You read the same register, HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_DATA, four times, assigning the value to data0-2/clk. The TRM I have doesn't talk about anything like that. What is the code supposed to do? The register HDMI_TXPHY_PAD_CONFIG_CONTROL also has bits for RXDET_LINE. Is that something different? > + } while ((tmds_data0 != tmds_data1 || tmds_data1 != tmds_data2 > + || tmds_data1 != tmds_clk) && (loop < 500)); This is a rather confusing way to do the loop. Why not just use for-loop with the timeout, and check the tmds variables inside the loop. Much easier to read. In the worst case the above causes a 7.5ms busy loop in an interrupt handler. That's not very good thing. Why is there a need for the loop? > + hdmi_write_reg(hdmi_wp_base(ip_data), HDMI_WP_WP_DEBUG_CFG, 0); > + > + return ((loop == 500) ? -1 : (tmds_data0 & 1)) ; This is also confusing. And you should return a proper error value, not -1. Perhaps: if (loop == 500) return -ETIMEDOUT; return tmds_data0 & 1; > +} > + > static int hdmi_check_hpd_state(struct hdmi_ip_data *ip_data) > { > unsigned long flags; > @@ -241,10 +265,19 @@ static int hdmi_check_hpd_state(struct hdmi_ip_data *ip_data) > return 0; > } > > - if (hpd) > + if (hpd) { > + /* before putting the phy in TX_ON,ensure that TMDS lanes > + * are pulled up . > + */ > + r = hdmi_ti_4xxx_rxdet(ip_data); > + if (r <= 0) { > + DSSERR("rxdet not set\n"); > + return r; > + } Does this mean that if the user connects a TV which is in a different channel than HDMI, the only way for the user to get an image is to disconnect the cable and connect it again? Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part