* Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120129 23:59]:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:02:01, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:55:43, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120122 23:26]:
> > > > Add missing break statement in the function omap3xxx_check_revision.
> > > >
> > > > The commit id 4390f5b2cb1f56 [ARM: OMAP: TI814X: Add cpu type macros
> > > > and detection support], removed the 'break' statement from the function
> > > > omap3xxx_check_revision(), resulting into wrong omap/cpu_revision
> > > > initialization for AM335x devices.
> > >
> > > Looks like this is already fixed, can you please verify with
> > > v3.3-rc1?
> > >
> > Tony,
> >
> > I just looked at your linux-omap/master branch and 'break' statement is missing. So this patch is still required.
> >
> > I can still see,
> >
> > 394 }
> > 395 break;
> > 396 case 0xb944:
> > 397 omap_revision = AM335X_REV_ES1_0;
> > 398 cpu_rev = "1.0";
> > 399 case 0xb8f2:
> > 400 switch (rev) {
> >
> >
> Tony,
>
> Can this be merged? I can still see "break" statement missing in the latest
> linux-omap/master branch.
OK thanks applying into fixes for the -rc cycle.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
