On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:38:09AM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:34 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Since you're using min_uV as the "register value" you probably ought to > > be returning that as the selector too and supplying a list_voltage() > > which just passes the selector back in case something tries to use it > > and gets confused. > I was thinking at some point about adding a list_voltage for these > regulators, however I dropped that idea, because the regulators can > support a range of voltages (from min to max) with some stepping value. > But... if you propose that the list_voltage would just return the > current voltage back, wouldn't that also potentially confuse the user > more, as it can only see the single voltage and nothing else, maybe > making it to think that the regulator can only support one voltage > level? Yes, that'd be completely broken. You'd need to just return the selector back which would tell them that they had voltage control in microvolt steps.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
