Hi Sakari, On Thursday 12 January 2012 00:03:55 Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:11:58AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Hi Tony and Paul, > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:14:16PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > > The register is used to configure the behaviour of the CSI-2 and > > > > CCP-2 receivers. This register is available only in OMAP3630. > > > > > > > > The original patch was submitted by Vimarsh Zutshi. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h | 1 + > > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h > > > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h index d4ef75d..6a26a0d 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h > > > > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ > > > > > > > > #define OMAP3630_CONTROL_FUSE_OPP120_VDD1 > > > > (OMAP2_CONTROL_GENERAL + 0x0120) #define > > > > OMAP3630_CONTROL_FUSE_OPP50_VDD2 (OMAP2_CONTROL_GENERAL + > > > > 0x0128) #define OMAP3630_CONTROL_FUSE_OPP100_VDD2 > > > > (OMAP2_CONTROL_GENERAL + 0x012C) > > > > > > > > +#define OMAP3630_CONTROL_CAMERA_PHY_CTRL (OMAP2_CONTROL_GENERAL + > > > > 0x02f0) > > > > > > I assume this patch hasn't gone anywhere yet which might be good. While > > > the definition of this register would appear to belong to this file, > > > it is being included from the OMAP 3 ISP driver, which only uses it if > > > it's running on the 3630. The problem is that control.h isn't > > > apparently intended to be included except locally and I didn't find a > > > suitable file under include/mach to put this definition either. > > > Currently this file is being included by the ISP driver with an > > > explicit path. > > > > > > Do you have an insight how this could be handled better? > > > > We've been trying to ensure that register accesses to/from a given IP > > block only occur in a driver for that IP block. So under that principle, > > any System Control Module accesses should go into a System Control Module > > driver. Then that SCM driver should export (via EXPORT_SYMBOL) a > > higher-level interface to whatever code uses it. The idea is that this > > interface would remain stable no matter what underlying SoC was in use. > > > > Only thing is, we don't yet have a SCM driver. Historically, since the > > SCM is tightly coupled with the underlying SoC, when we've needed to do > > something like this in the past, we've added code to > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c. But that's not really workable now. > > > > Do you know if this register, or something like it, is present on later > > OMAPs? Also, which bitfields are you planning to use? > > I don't believe it exists on other OMAPs --- possibly on 3730 but the CSI-2 > receiver is not officially supported on it. The register does not exist on > the 3430, at least not under the same name --- a reason for not existing > could be that the 3430 only has one CSI-2 receiver. The 4430 doesn't seem > to have it either, at least not under that name. > > I think the solution to conditionally access it in the ISP driver would be, > albeit not pretty, a workable one: the driver is unlikely to be used on > other platforms and this is a single register accessed in a single > location. I'm of course open for better options. A (maybe less intrusive) hack would be to add an accessor function in arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c and EXPORT_SYMBOL it. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
