On Wednesday 11 January 2012 07:29 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Currently the i2c driver calls the pm_runtime_enable and never >> the disable. This may cause a warning when pm_runtime_enable >> checks for the count match.Attempting to fix the same by calling >> pm_runtime_disable in the error and the remove path. > I remember seeing Felipe doing the reverse to musb here: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=132432610700952&w=2 > so I'm confused here. Strange however I see many drivers doing the same in the kernel on greping . Besides I expect a warn to come up. Felipe could you explain the issue? >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> >> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 2 ++ >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c >> index 12d402c..abc7b5b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c >> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ err_unuse_clocks: >> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0); >> pm_runtime_put(dev->dev); >> iounmap(dev->base); >> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); >> err_free_mem: >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); >> kfree(dev); >> @@ -1085,6 +1086,7 @@ omap_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> struct resource *mem; >> >> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); >> >> free_irq(dev->irq, dev); >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
