On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:11:11PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Seems to me like the get/set override should be more generic (part of > regulator core) instead of TWL specific? > Otherwise, whenever someone hooks up a non-TWL regulator to an OMAP and > is using HW control (via VC/VP), they'll have to duplicate all of this > stuff in their regulator driver? Frankly I'm not sure I understand how the hardware is supposed to work here - originally the plan was to just add a new regulator driver for the hardware control block which is I guess clean enough but it seems like some of the other control still goes via the normal path. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
