On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> + /* go through the available ELF segments */
>> + for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_phnum; i++, phdr++) {
>> + u32 da = phdr->p_paddr;
>> + u32 memsz = phdr->p_memsz;
>> + u32 filesz = phdr->p_filesz;
>
> This could be an endianess problem. If the endianess of the host and
> the rproc are different, then what is the endianess of the elf file?
> Is the endianess of the elf file verified before attempting to parse it?
...
> Nitpick: A look up table would be easier to extend in the future.
>
> Otherwise;
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Grant!
If I may, I'll add something like this to the commit log:
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (minus two
Reported-by issues)
And then we could fix those two issues in two subsequent patches
(carrying your Reported-by) so reviewing the change would be much
easier, and we don't end up changing code (that has been lying in
linux-next) just before it is sent it to Linus.
Thanks a lot for your review!
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
