On 12/22/2011 08:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > OK, sounds good to me. Maybe just make omap4_panda_init_rev() do > the cpu_is_omap check for now and then you can patch in the dynamic > detection later on? Yes, this is exactly what will be done for v3. >> We can use GPIOs to get the board ID, I'm looking at those for a >> followup patch. >> The only issue is that the ID1 GPIO number is different between 4430, >> and 4460 based Panda. >> We can have similar revision handling as we have for Beagle at the end. > > OK great. Thanks, Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
