Re: Is Pandaboard cpuhotplug working stably?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 05:59:07PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2011/12/21 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > cpu hotplug is basically totally buggered - the preconditions placed
> > upon the bringup code path are basically impossible to satisfy in any
> > shape or form at the moment.
> >
> > There's the requirement that the secondary CPU is marked online and
> > active before interrupts are enabled for the thread migration stuff
> > to behave correctly.  However, this is incompatible with smp_call_function()
> > which will wait for online CPUs to respond to an IPI - which this one
> > won't because interrupts are disabled.
> >
> > I think there was some discussion about how to fix this but I don't
> > recall the details.
> 
> thanks, Russell. then could i think this is an ARM-kernel-specific bug
> which exists on all ARM SMP chips for the moment?
> and that bug doesn't happen on x86:

I don't think so.  There's nothing ARM specific about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux