On Tuesday 20 December 2011 05:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Rob Herring<robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> [111219 14:29]:
On 12/19/2011 08:05 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is an RFC to add new device tree bindings for DDR memories and
EMIF - TI's DDR SDRAM controller.
The first patch adds bindings for DDR memories. Currently,
we have added properties for only DDR3 and LPDDR2 memories.
However, the binding can be easily extended to describe
other types such as DDR2 in the future.
The second patch provides the bindings for the EMIF controller.
The final patch provides DT data for EMIF controller instances
in OMAP4 and LPDDR2 memories attached to them on various boards.
Thanks to Rajendra for answering my numerous queries on device tree.
This is a re-post of the RFC that was posted to devicetree-discuss ml,
now sent to a larger audience and looping out an internal list.
Please ignore the previous version.
There's already a standard way (i.e. JEDEC standard) to define DDR chip
configuration that's called SPD. Why invent something new? While this is
normally an i2c eeprom on a DIMM, there's no reason you couldn't get it
from somewhere else including perhaps the DT. There's already code in
u-boot that can parse SPD data.
I agree generic JEDEC standard would be good for the DT.
Please see my comments in reply to Rob's mail. SPD doesn't seems to
have a standard for LPDDR2. What JEDEC has now is not suitable for our
needs.
In general, is it really feasible to parse the DTB before DDR is
initialized?
Changing timings is still needed for DVFS during runtime.
But we can boot to userspace with bootloader set timings, so I'm
As far as I understand, in the current out-of-tree DVFS implementation
for OMAP, DVFS can start even before user-space.
thinking that maybe these timings should be just set by loadable
modules. Just the configuration of which timings to select should
be passed via DT. Something in compatible like:
.compatible = "ti,omap3630", "sdram-micron-mt46h32m32lf-6";
And that should allow the SDRC driver to only accept timings for
"sdram-micron-mt46h32m32lf-6".
Do you mean one module per memory device and have all timing data in
the respective module? Wouldn't this clutter the kernel proper with all
these tables. By having the timing data in DT, it can be eventually
moved out of kernel eventually, right?
br,
Aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
