Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: musb: fix pm_runtime mismatches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> > Should these calls be pm_runtime_put_sync() instead of
>> > pm_runtime_put()?
>>
>> I don't see why... The thing failed, it's not going to be used any
>> more so better let PM deactivate the device.
>
> It's not a big deal.  The difference is that pm_runtime_put_sync()
> avoids an extra context switch when suspending the device.  A minor
> optimization, that's all.

Ok, I used what most of the code was using, but I've trusted you and
updated the patches. It would probably make sense to do the same in
other places.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux