* Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> [111214 03:31]: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:37AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > Making CACHE_L2X0 depend on (huge list of MACH_ and ARCH_ configs) > > is bothersome to maintain and likely to lead to merge conflicts. > > > > This patch moves the knowledge of which platforms have a L2x0 or > > PL310 cache controller to the individual machines. To enable this, > > a new MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 config option is introduced to allow > > machines to indicate that they may have such a cache controller > > independently of each other. > > > > Boards/SoCs which cannot reliably operate without the L2 cache > > controller support will need to select CACHE_L2X0 directly from > > their own Kconfigs instead. This applies to some TrustZone-enabled > > boards where Linux runs in the Normal World, for example. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > For CNS3xxx bits: > > Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> For omap: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
