On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:50:59 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> That would imply that I'd done more than glance over them, and > >> unfortunately I haven't :( > > > > Np, thanks for glancing :) > > I'd still like to ask for your Ack at least for the virtio_ids.h > change (please see below, and for the full patch, see > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg59537.html): > > Anyone following our threads will know you approved it, but I'm still > technically required to have your explicit ack as long as the patch > isn't going through your tree. > > I can always add something like: > > Virtio_ids.h-change-acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > So it doesn't imply anything else but this specific change, or I can > just put that hunk in a separate patch, and add then add your Acked-by > (so it doesn't imply anything on the rest of the patch set). It's usually done: Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (virtio_ids.h) And I've added it to the next version of the virtio-spec, so noone else grabs it. Thanks! Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
