On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:48:19 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Modern SoCs typically employ a central symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) >> application processor running Linux, with several other asymmetric >> multiprocessing (AMP) heterogeneous processors running different instances >> of operating system, whether Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS. > > OK, I'm not even sure who this should go through We shortly discussed this in ELCE, and this can either go through the arm-soc tree or directly to Linus; however Arnd prefers really. The previous RFC iteration was reviewed quite extensively (especially by Grant. thanks Grant!) but I was hoping to get some more review or feedback on this iteration as well (any form of Acked-by, Reviewed-by, +1-by or No-way-by are welcome). At this point I know of at least four vendors (besides TI) who are actively looking into supporting this, and it's getting a bit hard to collaborate, so I plan to get this into linux-next later this week (minus the virtio-spec.txt change which I'll send directly to you, Rusty) in the hope of getting this merged into 3.3. >, but no objections here Can I add your Acked-by on the virtio parts (mainly patches 3 and 6) ? Thanks! Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
