* Ilya Yanok <yanok@xxxxxxxxxxx> [111121 15:46]: > Hi Tony, > > On 19.11.2011 04:36, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> Well, it already boots with DT actually. Did you mean booting with DT > >> and board-generic? I have to admit I don't know how to proceed here: > > > > Good to hear you're already playing with it. Yes, let's work on making > > all the boards work with DT and board-generic.. > > Hm, do you think it's absolutely necessary to make everybody work with > board-generic? It will require a lot of additional bindings to get rid > of all machine-specific code. I've just thought that on PowerPC we don't > have such strict rules: if some boards are really similar they share > common machine file but if we need something specific for the new board > we can create it's own machine file. Well ideally yes we would remove the board files completely eventually. But that will take a while, so I can carry your board file in testing-board branch. > >> board-generic initialize twl4030 which we don't have on our board... > >> Could you give me some pointer how I'm supposed to handle this? > > > > .. we should only initialize twl4030/twl6030 if the DT compatible flag > > for it is set. But we're still missing the DT bindings for those :( > > > > For now, maybe try to fix the twl4030 probe so it won't do anything > > unless the I2C device is found? > > That turned to be not such a big problem. Device is not present so we > have tons of error messages but somehow it works. > > The bigger problem is that we have different regulator chip attached. > How am I supposed to register supplies/consumers data with it? Does > anybody working on DT bindings for the regulator framework? Rajendra has posted some regulator DT patches. I believe they have a dependency to the deferred probe patches in many cases though. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
