On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I did realize it's not used in the code. I just wanted to prevent what > I considered a misuse of "AMP". Thanks for accommodating my request. Sure thing, and thanks for the feedback. Dropping the 'amp' prefix also went well with my gut feeling that remoteproc and rpmsg should again be made as independent top-level subsystems, just like they were in the first patch set submission; they're not really coupled, and putting them together under the 'amp' folder just confused people and somewhat convoluted development. I suspect that once the basic functionality will be merged, the development of remoteproc and rpmsg will become completely orthogonal and it would then make sense to start queueing patches separately, so I've created two trees for them: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/remoteproc.git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/rpmsg.git Though at this point splitting the patches into two separate trees will just make it harder for people to work with the code, so both trees currently have the entire patch-set (and some other wip stuff). I've also created a for-next branch which I'll send to Stephen, and then we could start doing linear development (there's a bunch of patches I'll post soon, including stuff that was reported-by Stephen earlier) - that will hopefully make it easier for people to use this code, but also to review patches. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
