On 11/24/2011 12:43 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Saravana Kannan
<skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
remoteproc would probably be the best fit since it's already used in the
code and people are used to discussing about it.
Guys you realize that 'amp' isn't really being used in the code
itself; this discussion boils down to the text we have in the patches'
subject line and the top level Kconfig/folder entry :)
But, sure, I'll just drop those 'amp' text instances, and we'll have
'remoteproc' and 'rpmsg' as separate top-level frameworks again.
Thanks,
Ohad.
Yes, I did realize it's not used in the code. I just wanted to prevent
what I considered a misuse of "AMP". Thanks for accommodating my request.
-Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
