Hi Sergio, On Thursday 01 December 2011 18:35:20 Aguirre, Sergio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:51 Sergio Aguirre wrote: > >> The define should be the result of 1 << Bit number. > >> > >> Bit number for GPOCTL.GPO3 field is 2, which results > >> in 0x4 value. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@xxxxxx> > >> --- > >> include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h b/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h > >> index 2463c261..2a7ff16 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h > >> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ > >> > >> #define TWL6040_GPO1 0x01 > >> #define TWL6040_GPO2 0x02 > >> -#define TWL6040_GPO3 0x03 > >> +#define TWL6040_GPO3 0x04 > > > > What about defining the fields as (1 << x) instead then ? > > I thought about that, but I guess I just wanted to keep it consistent with > the rest of the file. I've seen that as well. I'm fine with keeping the above defines if you prefer. > Maybe I can create a separate patch for changing all these bitwise flags to > use BIT() macros instead. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
