> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Grinberg [mailto:grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 6:37 PM > To: Hiremath, Vaibhav > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; ohad@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUILD FIX:hwspinlock: do not return any value from > void funtion > > Hi Vaibhav, > > On 11/07/11 14:58, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > Fixes below compilation error - > > > > CC arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.o > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > > In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:22:0: > > include/linux/hwspinlock.h: In function '__hwspin_unlock': > > include/linux/hwspinlock.h:121:2: error: 'return' with a value, in > function > > returning void > > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.o] Error 1 > > make: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2 > > > > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/hwspinlock.h | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/hwspinlock.h b/include/linux/hwspinlock.h > > index 08a2fee..192710a 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/hwspinlock.h > > +++ b/include/linux/hwspinlock.h > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ int __hwspin_trylock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int > mode, unsigned long *flags) > > static inline > > void __hwspin_unlock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long > *flags) > > { > > - return 0; > > + return; > > Isn't it better to just remove this line? > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Yeup, we can do that... Submitting it again. Thanks, Vaibhav > > } > > > > static inline int hwspin_lock_get_id(struct hwspinlock *hwlock) > > > -- > Regards, > Igor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html