Hi Olof,
On Saturday 05 November 2011 01:59 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
+- regulator-min-uV: smallest voltage consumers may set
> +- regulator-max-uV: largest voltage consumers may set
> +- regulator-uV-offset: Offset applied to voltages to compensate for voltage drops
> +- regulator-min-uA: smallest current consumers may set
> +- regulator-max-uA: largest current consumers may set
> +- regulator-always-on: boolean, regulator should never be disabled
> +- regulator-boot-on: bootloader/firmware enabled regulator
>
Once you have a compatible field that can determine what kind of device node,
and binding, this is, you can drop the regulator- prefix and save some space in
the device tree. Properties are rarely prefixed by their subsystem. Only
exception would/could be the regulator-name property where it could make
sense to keep the prefix.
given that we decided not to have a compatible field like "regulator"
for the top-level bindings and instead have a device specific one,
and based on the discussions with Grant here[1], I hope its OK to keep
these the way they are.
regards,
Rajendra
[1]
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2011-September/008196.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
