On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: > Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Monday 03 October 2011 10:30 AM, Govindraj wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Friday 30 September 2011 04:31 PM, Govindraj.R wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Add API to determine IO-PAD wakeup event status for a given >>>>>> hwmod dynamic_mux pad. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wake up event set will be cleared on pad mux_read. >>>>> >>>>> Are these api's even getting used in this series? >>>> >>>> Used in Tero's irq_chaining patches. >>> >>> So shouldn't this patch be part of his series instead? >> >> Yes it is. Part of his v9-series. >> > > Then please drop from this series and state the introductory patch > (PATCH 0/n) that this series has a dependency on Tero's series. > Okay. -- Thanks, Govindraj.R -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
