Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Kevin, > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Split omap_device_build_ss() into two smaller functions: > ... >> This patch is considered an interim solution until DT fully materializes >> for omap; at that point, this functionality will be removed. > > Good news: we might not need this after all. Great. > I need the remoteproc devices to exists at ->reserve() time, so I can > assign them a private CMA pool, which means I can't wait for > omap_device_build_ss() and must create the devices beforehand. > > ... which makes Benoit's alloc/delete methods perfect for me. > > So please hold this one off for now. I'd just need a s/static// patch > that will allow me to use Benoit's methods outside of omap_device.c, > but I'll wait for things to settle down a bit before sending it, to > minimize this kind of churn. OK. Sounds good. Thanks, Kevin > Thanks and sorry for the noise, > Ohad. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
