Hi Kevin, On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Split omap_device_build_ss() into two smaller functions: ... > This patch is considered an interim solution until DT fully materializes > for omap; at that point, this functionality will be removed. Good news: we might not need this after all. I need the remoteproc devices to exists at ->reserve() time, so I can assign them a private CMA pool, which means I can't wait for omap_device_build_ss() and must create the devices beforehand. ... which makes Benoit's alloc/delete methods perfect for me. So please hold this one off for now. I'd just need a s/static// patch that will allow me to use Benoit's methods outside of omap_device.c, but I'll wait for things to settle down a bit before sending it, to minimize this kind of churn. Thanks and sorry for the noise, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
