On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:09:30AM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 9/27/2011 8:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >I'm not sure how this should work in a device tree world, I'd *hope* > >we'd get a device tree node for the CPU and could then just make this a > >regular consumer thing but then the cpufreq drivers would need to be > >updated to make use of it. The only reason we allow null devices right > >now is the fact that cpufreq doesn't have a struct device it can use. > That's why we do have a MPU node in OMAP dts, in order to build an > omap_device that will be mainly used for the DVFS on the MPU. > And even before DT migration, we used to build statically some > omap_device to represent the various processors in the system (MPU, > DSP, CortexM3...). Yeah, but that's very OMAP specific - we don't have that in general (in fact it's the only Linux platform I'm aware of that has a device for the CPU). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
