On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:19:37PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2011 05:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:42:51PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>+ if (!dev) > >>+ return NULL; > >So how do we handle CPUs? cpufreq is one of the most active users of > >regulators... > Hmm, never thought of it :( > Maybe I should associate a supply name with all > regulators and then lookup from the global registered > list. I'm not sure how this should work in a device tree world, I'd *hope* we'd get a device tree node for the CPU and could then just make this a regular consumer thing but then the cpufreq drivers would need to be updated to make use of it. The only reason we allow null devices right now is the fact that cpufreq doesn't have a struct device it can use. > >>+ snprintf(prop_name, 32, "%s-supply", supply); > >>+ > >>+ prop = of_get_property(dev->of_node, prop_name,&sz); > >>+ if (!prop || sz< 4) > >>+ return NULL; > >sz< 4? Magic! :) > Its the valid phandle size. > I guess I need a sz != 4 I think we need an of_get_phandle(), it'd be clearer what the check is, more type safe and would avoid needing to replicate the check. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
