On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> [110920 01:34]: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream. > > > > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a > > bulk of OMAP changes. > > > > Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific anymore though (we gained support for > > STE's u8500) and the vast majority of changes are in drivers/. We're > > still very much ARM-related, though this may change too at some point > > (c6x has a similar "hardware semaphore" peripheral like the u8500 > > does). > > > > Tony, if you're still willing to pick up these updates I'd be happy to > > send you pull requests of course. > > I'd prefer for Greg to take these as these are drivers. > > If he's not taking it at this point based on it being ARM only, > I can take it then. Sorry for replying late, I had accidentally ignored the entire thread. My feeling is that it would be best for Ohad to send these directly to Linus, since it's basically a standalone subsystem and he's listed as the maintainer (well, after this series at least). I'm also fine with any of the other paths like ohad->GregKH->torvalds ohad->arnd->torvalds ohad->tmlind->torvalds ohad->tmlind->arnd->torvalds Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
