> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taneja, Archit
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 3:31 PM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: Valkeinen, Tomi; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Semwal, Sumit; linux-
> media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Taneja, Archit
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Fix VSYNC IRQ handling in
> omap_vout_isr
>
> Currently, in omap_vout_isr(), if the panel type is DPI, and if we
> get either VSYNC or VSYNC2 interrupts, we proceed ahead to set the
> current buffers state to VIDEOBUF_DONE and prepare to display the
> next frame in the queue.
>
> On OMAP4, because we have 2 LCD managers, the panel type itself is not
> sufficient to tell if we have received the correct irq, i.e, we shouldn't
> proceed ahead if we get a VSYNC interrupt for LCD2 manager, or a VSYNC2
> interrupt for LCD manager.
>
> Fix this by correlating LCD manager to VSYNC interrupt and LCD2 manager
> to VSYNC2 interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
> b/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
> index c5f2ea0..20638c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
> @@ -566,8 +566,8 @@ err:
>
> static void omap_vout_isr(void *arg, unsigned int irqstatus)
> {
> - int ret, fid;
> - u32 addr;
> + int ret, fid, mgr_id;
> + u32 addr, irq;
> struct omap_overlay *ovl;
> struct timeval timevalue;
> struct omapvideo_info *ovid;
> @@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ static void omap_vout_isr(void *arg, unsigned int
> irqstatus)
> if (!ovl->manager || !ovl->manager->device)
> return;
>
> + mgr_id = ovl->manager->id;
> cur_display = ovl->manager->device;
>
> spin_lock(&vout->vbq_lock);
> @@ -590,7 +591,14 @@ static void omap_vout_isr(void *arg, unsigned int
> irqstatus)
>
> switch (cur_display->type) {
> case OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_DPI:
> - if (!(irqstatus & (DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC | DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC2)))
> + if (mgr_id == OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD)
> + irq = DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC;
> + else if (mgr_id == OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD2)
> + irq = DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC2;
> + else
> + goto vout_isr_err;
> +
> + if (!(irqstatus & irq))
> goto vout_isr_err;
> break;
I understand what this patch meant for, but I am more curious to know
What is value addition of this patch?
if (!(irqstatus & (DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC | DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC2)))
Vs
if (mgr_id == OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD)
irq = DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC;
else if (mgr_id == OMAP_DSS_CHANNEL_LCD2)
irq = DISPC_IRQ_VSYNC2;
Isn't this same, because we are not doing anything separate and special
for VSYNC and VSYNC2?
Thanks,
Vaibhav
> case OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_VENC:
> --
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
