Hello, linux-arm-kernel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on : > I'm going to be merging a mach-types update (the cut-down and the > policy-conforming version) for the next merge window. This will mean > that things WILL BREAK, and I will not notice that things have broken. > > In order to fix this, entries need to be fixed to conform to the > requirements - where the machine_is_xxx() name is the same as the > MACH_TYPE_xxx name and the CONFIG_MACH_xxx name too. > > Moreover, entries older than 12 months which have not been merged will > be removed. It is not possible to automatically check for machine_is_xxx() > usages as these could conflict with other architectures, and I'm > certainly NOT checking for them by hand (I estimate that'd take a > significant amount of manual effort to do.) What that means > is that it > is _important_ to get the core platform support in _first_ before any > drivers which may make use of this. > > The following will be deleted from the file this time around are: [...] > -ti8148evm MACH_TI8148EVM TI8148EVM 3004 I guess this was removed due to being older than 12 months. But since I had submitted v1 (see [1]) and am working on v2 post review, can you please suggest how to go about it as I will need the above for adding support for TI8148 EVM? [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg53457.html Thanks. Hemant-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
