On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:11 +0530, K, Mythri P wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, you are right, detect() does not "know" if the monitor has changed > > between polls, so both notification and polling are needed. I > > implemented only polling as there's no HPD event mechanism yet in > > omapdss, and also because this was simple and gives DRM basic ability to > > detect a monitor. > > > If it is needed for DRM then it is fine, but with detect renamed to > poll. By next week i should have a patch ready for HPD event > mechanism. What is wrong with "detect"? It detects if there's a display connected. It can be used in polling manner, trying it every n seconds, but it should also be used even if you use HPD event. I think the normal sequence would be something like: 1) register HPD event 2) use detect() to see if a monitor is already connected Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
