Mike, Kevin, On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx> wrote: > From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > We have multiple interrupt status hidden in the PRM interrupt status > reg. Make this handling generic to allow us to pull out LDO status such > as those for ABB from it using the same data structure and indexing. We > hence rename accordingly. I am not sure that the rename is needed. Kevin, Nishant, what is your opinion? Regards, Jean > > We also fix a trivial warning as the variable does not need exporting: > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.c:172:22: warning: symbol > 'omap3_prm_irqs' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.h | 7 +++++-- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.h | 7 +++++-- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/vp.h | 9 --------- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/vp3xxx_data.c | 4 ++-- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/vp44xx_data.c | 6 +++--- > 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
