On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:36:43PM -0400, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Hi > > > > Some comments. > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Keerthy wrote: > > > [ ... ] > > > > > +} > > > + > > > +/* Sysfs hook functions */ > > > > These should be conditionally compiled out if sysfs isn't compiled in. > > > The whole point of the hwmon subsystem is to expose hardware monitoring information > to userland using sysfs. hwmon without sysfs doesn't make sense. > > So, if anything, it might make sense to disable the entire hwmon tree if sysfs is disabled. > But please no conditionals in the code. Hmm. This IP block is more than just a sensor. It also can interrupt the CPU and/or trigger a GPIO line (to shut down the chip) if the chip temperature crosses some thresholds. On some OMAPs, the thresholds are fixed; on others, they are software-programmable. That functionality shouldn't require sysfs; it's almost closer to an x86 MCE. So based on your comments, it sounds like we should move that part of the code to a different driver, and just leave the basic software thermal monitoring here? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
