Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> if (act_lat > odpl->activate_lat) {
>> odpl->activate_lat_worst = act_lat;
>> if (odpl->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST) {
>> odpl->activate_lat = act_lat;
>> - pr_warning("omap_device: %s.%d: new worst case "
>> - "activate latency %d: %llu\n",
>> - od->pdev.name, od->pdev.id,
>> - od->pm_lat_level, act_lat);
>> + dev_warn(&od->pdev.dev,
>> + "new worst case activate latency "
>> + "%d: %llu\n",
>> + od->pm_lat_level, act_lat);
>
> I wonder why these have to be warnings, I get quite a lot of them and
> find them rather annoying. Or is my hardware broken or something?
No, your hardware is not broken.
> I know other people are disabling this in their trees too:
> http://www.sakoman.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-omap-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=145cf9a7d4ba7c260df7071a28ef40c6a481b6df
Patches to change that are welcome on the list.
It's not related to this patch which just changes from pr_warning to
dev_warn, so needs to be done in a separate patch.
Kevin
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
