Vishwa, Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> writes: [...] >> A quick glance now suggests it has a few minor problems. >> >> - patch was not Cc's to linux-arm-kernel >> - uses 44XX naming which is not used in l-o master > Sorry I did not get this point. What do you mean by 44XX naming? > I applied this patch against lo master and it seems to apply and compile > perfectly fine. You're right. Sorry, my fault. I thought I saw some CHIP_IS stuff in this patch using the 44XX naming that Tony did not merge for 3.1, but I was mistaken. It's only used in some register offset defines, which is fine. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
