On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Silesh C V wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > That might have been correct on some ancient > > dead language, but I like better when things > > are recent. > > > > Fix the alphabetical order. > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Fixed missing comma after Richard's name and removed > > comma after Vikram's name. > > > > Thanks Charulatha Varadarajan for spotting those two. > > > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 7 +++---- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > > index e4c349f..5a2369ba 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > > @@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ > > * Copyright (C) 2009 Nokia Corporation > > * Paul Walmsley > > * > > - * Developed in collaboration with (alphabetical order): Benoit > > - * Cousson, Kevin Hilman, Tony Lindgren, Rajendra Nayak, Vikram > > - * Pandita, Sakari Poussa, Anand Sawant, Santosh Shilimkar, Richard > > - * Woodruff > > Looks like the original author was referring to the last names when he > meant 'in alphabetical order' which is also correct in a way. So it > looks like it is not only correct in a dead ancient language but also > in some recent ones. :-) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_order#Name_order Silesh's conclusion is correct. - Paul
