On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > That might have been correct on some ancient > dead language, but I like better when things > are recent. > > Fix the alphabetical order. > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > --- > > Fixed missing comma after Richard's name and removed > comma after Vikram's name. > > Thanks Charulatha Varadarajan for spotting those two. > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 7 +++---- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > index e4c349f..5a2369ba 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > @@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ > * Copyright (C) 2009 Nokia Corporation > * Paul Walmsley > * > - * Developed in collaboration with (alphabetical order): Benoit > - * Cousson, Kevin Hilman, Tony Lindgren, Rajendra Nayak, Vikram > - * Pandita, Sakari Poussa, Anand Sawant, Santosh Shilimkar, Richard > - * Woodruff Looks like the original author was referring to the last names when he meant 'in alphabetical order' which is also correct in a way. So it looks like it is not only correct in a dead ancient language but also in some recent ones. :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_order#Name_order Regards, Silesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
