Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong OMAP_ES_x_y defines that make omap_rev_lt_x_y and friends misbehave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Premi, Sanjeev <premi@xxxxxx> [110616 06:22]:
> > 
> > Hmm, we don't seem to have these in the mainline kernel?
> > Maybe take a look if something still needs to patched
> > there?
> 
> [sp] Yes. these don't apply on mainline.
>      I believe the kernel is using this patch I submitted [1],
>      (or derived from it), but missing [2].
> 
> Tony,
>   Now that there are multiple processors with their own
>   revisions, do you believe an update version of [1]
>   patch would be useful?

Yes please take a look and see if we still need to patch
something in the mainline kernel for this.

Regards,

Tony
 
>   [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127972517400499&w=2
>   [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=128597605524824&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux