> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:11 PM > To: Tasslehoff Kjappfot > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong OMAP_ES_x_y defines that make > omap_rev_lt_x_y and friends misbehave > > * Tasslehoff Kjappfot <tasskjapp@xxxxxxxxx> [110614 03:35]: > > From 620fa271b32f8bdd8f06954c0a2c96af6ed1dc7b Mon Sep 17 > 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Tasslehoff Kjappfot <tasskjapp@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:06:09 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Fix wrong OMAP_ES_x_y defines that make > > omap_rev_lt_x_y and friends misbehave > > Hmm, we don't seem to have these in the mainline kernel? > Maybe take a look if something still needs to patched > there? [sp] Yes. these don't apply on mainline. I believe the kernel is using this patch I submitted [1], (or derived from it), but missing [2]. Tony, Now that there are multiple processors with their own revisions, do you believe an update version of [1] patch would be useful? [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127972517400499&w=2 [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=128597605524824&w=2 ~sanjeev > > Tony > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
