Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] OMAP2+: hwmod: Follow the recommended PRCM module enable sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/28/2011 2:33 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 6/28/2011 7:16 PM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx> writes:

From: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@xxxxxx>

On OMAP4, the PRCM recommended sequence for enabling
a module after power-on-reset is:
-1- Force clkdm to SW_WKUP
-2- Enabling the clocks
-3- Configure desired module mode to "enable" or "auto"
-4- Wait for the desired module idle status to be FUNC
-5- Program clkdm in HW_AUTO(if supported)

This sequence applies to all older OMAPs' as well,
however since they use autodeps, it makes sure that
no clkdm is in IDLE, and hence not requiring a force
SW_WKUP when a module is being enabled.

OK, I found the problem that prevents booting on OMAP3...

Cool... thanks for that.

OMAP4 does not need to support autodeps, because
of the dyanamic dependency feature, wherein
the HW takes care of waking up a clockdomain from
idle and hence the module, whenever an interconnect
access happens to the given module.

Implementing the sequence for OMAP4 requires
the clockdomain handling that is currently done in
clock framework to be done as part of hwmod framework
since the step -4- above to "Wait for the desired
module idle status to be FUNC" is done as part of
hwmod framework.

Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@xxxxxx>
[b-cousson@xxxxxx: Adapt it to the new clkdm hwmod attribute and API]
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Walmsley<paul@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 17 +----------------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
index 180299e..2828d29 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
@@ -268,9 +268,6 @@ void omap2_clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
clk->ops->disable(clk);
}

- if (clk->clkdm)
- clkdm_clk_disable(clk->clkdm, clk);
-
if (clk->parent)
omap2_clk_disable(clk->parent);
}
@@ -308,30 +305,18 @@ int omap2_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
}
}

- if (clk->clkdm) {
- ret = clkdm_clk_enable(clk->clkdm, clk);
- if (ret) {
- WARN(1, "clock: %s: could not enable clockdomain %s: "
- "%d\n", clk->name, clk->clkdm->name, ret);
- goto oce_err2;
- }
- }
-
if (clk->ops&& clk->ops->enable) {
trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, smp_processor_id());
ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
if (ret) {
WARN(1, "clock: %s: could not enable: %d\n",
clk->name, ret);
- goto oce_err3;
+ goto oce_err2;
}
}

The clkdm enable/disable in this part of the patch is still required on
OMAP2/3, since the clkdm is still attached to the clock and not to the
hwmod.

OK, but I guess that in case of OMAP4, we are probably incrementing
twice the usage counter... but that should not hurt, because we will
decrement twice as well.

Rajendra,
Does that seems OK to you?

When I did the initial patch, all clkdm's were still associated with
clocks, and removing this from clock framework made sense and also
worked on OMAP3/2, because I had clkdm_clk_enable/disable being called
from hwmod framework.
Now that we have clkdm_hwmod_enable/disable being called from hwmod
framework, and clkdm's are associated with hwmod, I guess its best to
do this for all OMAP's. Keeping this association of clkdm with clocks
(for OMAP3/2) and the above piece of code because that association
exits looks messy.


Thanks,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux